Financing & cap-table economics · Switzerland

Raise capital without losing sight ofownership and control.

Legal structuring for Swiss pre-seed and seed rounds. Combining the transaction documents with the cap-table outcome founders and investors need to understand before signing.

We compare structures, model realistic dilution and turn the selected route into a practical closing process.

When this mandate is useful

  • You are preparing a pre-seed or seed round and need to choose between a convertible loan and a priced equity round.
  • You already have convertibles, promised equity or an option pool that makes the fully diluted cap table difficult to read.
  • A term sheet is on the table, but the ownership and control consequences have not yet been modelled.
  • You want one workstream for commercial structuring, legal documents, corporate approvals and closing.

Four issues that become expensive when left until closing

The instrument is selected before the constraint is understood

A convertible loan may be faster, while a priced round may create more certainty. The right answer depends on timing, valuation readiness, investor expectations and the next financing, not on which template is easiest to find.

Headline valuation is mistaken for the founder outcome

Conversion caps, discounts, interest, option-pool increases and the size of the new investment interact. Two offers with the same valuation can therefore produce different ownership results.

Percentage ownership is reviewed without governance

Board composition, reserved matters, information rights and transfer rules can change practical control even where the founders retain a clear economic majority.

Historic shortcuts reappear in diligence

Unrecorded equity promises, inconsistent convertible terms, missing approvals or an outdated shareholders’ agreement can delay the round and shift negotiation leverage to the investor.

What the mandate produces

A decision-ready financing structure in which the documents, venture math and corporate execution tell the same story.

01

Structure recommendation

A reasoned comparison of the viable instruments, including what each option solves now, what it defers and how it affects the next round.

02

Fully diluted cap-table model

Ownership scenarios that combine issued shares, convertibles, employee participation and the new investment under clearly stated assumptions.

03

Term-sheet and negotiation map

A prioritised view of the terms that affect economics, control and future flexibility, separated from points that are mainly drafting detail.

04

Transaction documents

Drafting or review of the financing and corporate documents required for the selected structure, coordinated with the commercial deal.

05

Approvals and closing plan

A practical sequence covering stakeholder decisions, signatures, corporate actions and the information needed to complete the transaction.

06

Post-closing ownership record

A reconciled view of the ownership structure after closing so the company starts the next stage with a cap table it can explain and maintain.

Choose the financing structure by constraint, not convention

The central question is not whether one instrument is universally better. It is which decisions must be made now, which can responsibly wait and what uncertainty the company can afford to carry into the next round.

01

Convertible loan

Useful when

The company needs speed and runway, while a defensible valuation or full investor group is not yet available.

Watch for

Conversion trigger and sequence, valuation cap, discount, interest, maturity, ranking, investor protections and the treatment of a financing that does not occur as planned.

02

Priced equity round

Useful when

The valuation and investor group are ready to be fixed, and the company benefits from resolving ownership and governance now.

Watch for

Pre- versus post-money definitions, option-pool treatment, liquidation preference, governance rights, warranties and the corporate closing steps.

03

Bridge or mixed structure

Useful when

A specific milestone or transaction is close enough that interim capital can bridge a defined timing gap.

Watch for

Whether the bridge has a credible destination, how new money interacts with existing instruments and what happens if the planned round is delayed or smaller than expected.

The cap-table mechanics to model before the term sheet is signed

The useful model is not a single percentage. It shows how ownership changes under explicit assumptions and where the legal definitions alter the denominator.

Founder outcome = current ownership − convertible dilution − option-pool dilution − new-investor dilution

Pre-money versus post-money

Clarify whether outstanding convertibles and any pool increase sit inside or outside the negotiated valuation. The label alone is not enough; the operative definitions decide the allocation.

Cap and discount interaction

Test which conversion method applies in the expected round and in less favourable scenarios. The headline cap does not by itself reveal the number of shares issued on conversion.

Conversion sequence

Where several instruments exist, model the order and denominator used for each conversion. Small differences in drafting can compound across the round.

Option-pool increase

Identify how much pool is genuinely needed, when it is created and whose percentage bears the increase. A pre-closing top-up commonly affects the parties differently from a post-closing increase.

Economic rights

Read liquidation preference, anti-dilution protection and participation rights alongside ordinary percentage ownership. Exit proceeds may not follow the headline cap table in every outcome.

Control rights

Map board seats, vetoes, reserved matters, information rights and transfer restrictions. Economic ownership and practical decision-making power are related, but not identical.

Illustrative founder scenario

The valuation increased, but founder dilution still exceeded expectations

Context
A startup enters its seed round with two convertible loans and plans to enlarge the employee option pool as part of the transaction. The parties focus negotiations on the new pre-money valuation.
Consequence
When the loans convert and the pool is increased before the new investment, the founders’ fully diluted percentage falls further than the valuation discussion suggested. Governance rights in the new shareholders’ agreement also narrow the decisions the founders can make alone.
Approach
Build a transaction waterfall before signing the term sheet: reconcile every instrument, test the conversion sequence, separate the pool top-up and compare the ownership and control outcome under the expected and downside cases.
A higher valuation can still produce a weaker founder outcome if the rest of the financing mechanics are not negotiated as one system.

Pre-round readiness checklist

The strongest time to resolve uncertainty is before investor diligence and term-sheet pressure compress the decision window.

  1. 01

    Reconcile the current cap table

    Match issued shares against the share register and collect every convertible, option grant, transfer and written or informal equity promise.

  2. 02

    Define the financing objective

    Translate the amount sought into runway, milestones and a credible next financing point. This makes instrument and valuation choices easier to evaluate.

  3. 03

    Set modelling assumptions

    Document the valuation, round size, conversion method, accrued amounts, option-pool target and any securities expected before closing.

  4. 04

    Compare at least three outcomes

    Model the likely case, a lower-valuation or smaller-round case, and a scenario in which the next financing is delayed.

  5. 05

    Separate economics from control

    Review ownership percentages and governance terms on parallel tracks so a concession in one is not overlooked because the other appears attractive.

  6. 06

    Clean up corporate records

    Identify missing approvals, signatures, registers and historic transaction documents before they become investor diligence findings.

  7. 07

    Agree negotiation priorities

    Decide which outcomes are essential, which terms can be traded and who is authorised to negotiate for the company.

  8. 08

    Plan the closing path

    Map dependencies, stakeholder availability and corporate actions early, particularly where the chosen structure requires formal implementation steps.

How the mandate works

01

Diagnose

We review the cap table, existing instruments, financing objective and decision constraints, then identify the gaps that could affect structure or timing.

02

Model and negotiate

We compare viable structures, calculate stakeholder outcomes and turn the selected priorities into a term sheet and negotiation position.

03

Document and close

We prepare or review the transaction documents, coordinate approvals and signatures, and reconcile the post-closing ownership position.

Financing and cap-table questions founders ask

Should founders optimise for valuation or dilution?

Valuation matters, but dilution is the more complete outcome measure because it also captures outstanding convertibles, the option pool, the amount raised and how the operative definitions allocate shares. Control rights should then be assessed separately.

When should the cap table be modelled?

Before agreeing the term sheet, and again whenever a material term changes. Once the commercial terms are signed, correcting an unexpected ownership outcome becomes more difficult and may require reopening the deal.

Is a convertible loan always simpler than an equity round?

It can be faster to document initially, but it defers valuation and conversion questions rather than eliminating them. Complexity increases where several instruments, different terms or an uncertain next-round pathway are involved.

What does fully diluted ownership mean?

It is a scenario view that goes beyond currently issued shares and includes the securities and commitments expected to become equity, such as convertibles and employee participation. The precise denominator must be defined for the transaction being modelled.

Can founders retain control after selling a significant stake?

Sometimes. Practical control depends on both percentage ownership and the agreed governance framework, including board composition, voting thresholds, reserved matters and transfer rules.

What should we prepare before speaking with investors?

Start with a reconciled cap table, copies of all existing financing and equity documents, a clear financing objective, a realistic option-pool plan and an initial view of the outcomes the founders need to protect.

Go deeper on the founder decisions behind the round

Note: This page provides general information and is not legal or tax advice. The appropriate structure and implementation depend on the company, its existing documents, the investor group and the specific transaction. Illustrations are simplified and do not represent a client matter.

Review the financing before the term sheet fixes the outcome

Bring the current cap table, existing convertibles or draft term sheet. We will identify the decisions that materially affect ownership, control and the closing path.

Book a meeting